Call it the unintentional self-outing of an American far-Left winger.
That would be the realization of Nick Fuentes, the self-professed admirer of Stalin who also thinks Hitler was “cool.”
Over there at The Bulwark was this reportage of Fuentes talking to Tucker Carlson:
Nick Fuentes: “It was December 18…That’s Joseph Stalin’s birthday. I’m a fan.”
Tucker Carlson: “You’re a fan of Stalin?”
Nick Fuentes: “Always an admirer.”
Tucker Carlson: “Well that’s uh…Okay. We’ll circle back to that.”
Spoiler: Tucker never circles back. pic.twitter.com/ZRBIVjFb7a
— The Bulwark (@BulwarkOnline) October 28, 2025
And his thoughts on Hitler: “This guy’s awesome, this guy’s cool.”
Message full stop.
Doubtless unintentionally, here is the self-revelation that, far from being a conservative of any kind, Fuentes is a full-blown Leftist.
Hitler was “cool”? Recall the full name of the political party Hitler headed, bold print for emphasis supplied. That would be the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. Say again, the keyword is “Socialist.” Nothing conservative or right-leaning about that, as all those denizens of New York City are about to learn with the election of a full-blown, proud socialist as their new mayor.
Stalin? Fuentes, admires Stalin? Hello? Joseph Stalin was the proud leader of Russia’s Communist Party. The personal heir of Communist Party founder Vladimir Lenin. And not to mention:
According to historians who studied Soviet archives before and after the fall of the Soviet Union, Joseph Stalin likely killed between six million and 20 million people. However, given the widespread and often unrecorded deaths of the Stalin years, it’s certainly possible that that number is even higher.
Which is to say, Stalin, whom Fuentes professes to admire, was not a conservative, to say the least.
All of which is to say, the sudden effort to paint Fuentes as a right-winger is a laughable untruth. Only a lefty could possibly admire Stalin and his murderous reign.
Another example? Here’s this bold fairy tale right there in The New York Times, which just the other day described the Nazi loving Fuentes as “right-wing pundit Nick Fuentes.”
Got that? The guy who idolizes one of the worst socialists, decidedly far-Left dictators in history — Hitler no less!! — is “right-wing”.
Again, this is decidedly, laughably, not true. Fuentes is not “right-wing” … and most certainly neither was Hitler, he was the leader of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party.
So what’s going on here with this effort to paint Fuentes as “right-wing”? What this is really about, in part, one can easily suspect, is the media trying to escape the reality that the American Left has a long, very serious bent for outright violence.
As if to underline the point, just two months ago, on September 10, it was a leftist, most decidedly not a conservative, who assassinated conservative leader Charlie Kirk. And not to mention, no conservative would be an admirer of Hitler, the founder of Germany’s “Socialist Workers’ Party.” Or of Communist Party leader Stalin.
But going further back in American history to the 1960s, as the GovFacts site correctly notes of the Left in America (and a reminder for those of us who lived through the period and remember it vividly!):
The 1960s were not simply violent; they were a period of sustained, multifaceted civil conflict that surpassed that of nearly all other Western democracies. The decade’s turmoil was not a single phenomenon but a convergence of several distinct, yet overlapping, struggles that played out in the streets, on college campuses, and in American cities. The violence emanated from those demanding fundamental change to the nation’s social and political order and from those, including the state itself, who violently resisted that change.
Exactly.
Which is to say the 1960s in America were overflowing with Left-wing violence. Again, there was nothing remotely conservative about that.
To sum up?
The effort to paint Fuentes as some sort of “conservative” will not go anywhere. By his own admission to Tucker Carlson, Fuentes talks of his fondness for two of the most vivid personifications of far-Left wing radicalism in all of history — Hitler and Stalin.
It would be hard to get further Left than that.
Although, as history records, from Mao to Ho Chi Minh to Castro and more, there is no lack of others trying to do so.
READ MORE from Jeffrey Lord:
![Prince Andrew Gives Up Duke of York Title Amid Renewed Scrutiny Over Ties to Epstein [WATCH]](https://www.right2024.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Prince-Andrew-Gives-Up-Duke-of-York-Title-Amid-Renewed-350x250.jpg)
