Judge Continues Block On Defunding Planned Parenthood

A Massachusetts district judge extended a temporary restraining order Friday blocking the enforcement of a new provision that would cut Medicaid funding to certain Planned Parenthood health centers.

Obama-appointed federal Judge Indira Talwani ruled that a provision of the Reconciliation Act, which would prevent Medicaid reimbursements to organizations providing abortions and meeting certain financial criteria, including receiving over $800,000 in Medicaid reimbursements in 2023, could not be enforced. The ruling specifically impacts the Planned Parenthood Federation of America and its affiliates, including the Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts and Planned Parenthood Association of Utah.

“Defendants, their agents, employees, appointees, successors, and anyone acting in concert or participation with Defendants shall take all steps necessary to ensure that Medicaid funding continues to be disbursed in the customary manner and timeframes to Planned Parenthood Federation of America’s members, including but not limited to Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts and Planned Parenthood Association of Utah,” the order states.

WASHINGTON, DC – APRIL 02: Anti-abortion protestors gather outside the U.S. Supreme Court as oral arguments are delivered in the case of Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic on April 2, 2025 in Washington D.C. (Photo by Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images)

The court required Planned Parenthood to post a nominal bond of $100 by July 15, 2025. The order will remain in effect until at least July 21, 2025, unless further amended. The decision marks a temporary victory for Planned Parenthood, securing continued Medicaid funding for its health centers while the legal battle over the provision continues.

The court’s decision came in response to a motion that Planned Parenthood filed, arguing that the law would cause significant disruptions in healthcare services for Medicaid patients.(RELATED: Media Said The Big Beautiful Bill Was Dead. Trump Proved Them Wrong)

In issuing the restraining order, the court said the plaintiffs were likely to succeed in their challenge to the constitutionality of the law.

The judge said the law caused irreparable harm, adding that the disruption of healthcare services cannot be undone after the fact. While the court acknowledged the defendants’ procedural objections, it upheld the temporary restraining order to prevent immediate harm while a full hearing is scheduled.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.