Top Stories     Top Stories 1Featured

‘Sue them!’ President calls NY Times economist a ‘Trump Deranged BUM’ for being ‘wrong for years’

A Nobel Prize-winning “Trump Deranged BUM” took serious heat from the president over his latest economic “Doom and Gloom” that found many contending the award “doesn’t mean much.”

Sunday, New Keynesian economist Paul Krugman had a considerable amount to say about President Donald Trump’s supposedly “clearly illegal” tariffs. However, nods to the Great Depression were no match for the dealmaker-in-chief’s unbridled optimism about market performance as Trump chided the analyst as “wrong for YEARS.”

Following Krugman’s latest piece titled, “The Economics of Smoot Hawley 2.0, Part II,” the president took to Truth Social to slam the former New York Times columnist and said, “Paul Krugman of the New York Times has been predicting Doom and Gloom ever since my great election success in 2016. In other words, he had been wrong for YEARS, as ALL markets have been hitting new HIGHS, and are now higher than ever before. People stayed out of the ‘BEST MARKET IN [HISTORY]’ because of this Trump Deranged BUM. Sue them!”

Within the economist’s article, the tariff policy was dubbed “Smoot Hawley 2.0” as a reference to the Great Depression era Tariff Act that was meant to protect American companies from foreign competition and instead resulted in retaliatory tariffs.

Expecting a Federal Circuit Court to uphold the decision of the Court of International Trade ahead of an anticipated Supreme Court appeal, Krugman argued, “Most of Donald Trump’s tariffs are clearly illegal.”

He also attempted to make a case that the president had “reversed 90 years of tariff reductions” by featuring a chart of the average U.S. tariffs between 1929 and the present with data from Statista and the Yale Budget Lab that showed the last 50 years sitting somewhere between 0-5% tariff rates.

Of course projections of the purported “high tariffs” that were “probably here to stay,” still fell below the rate imposed a few years prior to Smoot-Hawley following the 1922 Fordney McCumber Act implemented to protect manufacturers and farmers, as charted by the Visual Capitalist using data from the U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. International Trade Commission and Tax Foundation.

It was also less than half the rate during the 1890s before the Sixteenth Amendment and the implementation of a federal income tax.

While Krugman went on to make arguments on how tariffs are “regressive tax increases that help pay for regressive tax cuts,” offer a “false promise of a revival in manufacturing jobs” and how he views the impact on wages, the president plowed ahead with making historic trade deals worth hundreds of billions of dollars as he leveraged the threat of higher tariffs to impact foreign policy.

Only days earlier, he warned India that it had three weeks to cease importation of Russian petroleum products, roughly 1.75 million barrels of oil per day, or the current tariff rate of 25% imposed on July 30 would be increased to 50%.

Like Trump, reactions on social media found little favor for Krugman or his 2008 award, as one X user said, “I sat through Krugman’s masterclass hoping to learn something. I think I learned about Marxism, and that the Nobel prize doesn’t mean much.”

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.

Kevin Haggerty
Latest posts by Kevin Haggerty (see all)

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.



Source link

Related Posts

1 of 78