Democrats Step on a Rake in Attempt to Dunk on Trump, Show Biden, Obama Fails Instead

A social media post by a Democratic-aligned political group drew criticism on X this week after users challenged the group’s claims about rising beef prices and disputed its attempt to attribute those increases to President Donald Trump.

The post was published by the Senate Majority PAC, an organization focused on supporting Democratic candidates in U.S. Senate races.

The group shared a chart showing average beef prices compiled by the U.S. Department of Agriculture over a period spanning four decades.

The post suggested that Republicans, and President Trump in particular, were responsible for higher beef prices facing consumers.

“Let’s be honest for a second. Republicans don’t care about the price of beef because they don’t answer to working Americans,” SMPAC wrote on X.

Let’s be honest for a second.

Republicans don’t care about the price of beef because they don’t answer to working Americans. pic.twitter.com/i5ed769k6O

— Senate Majority PAC (@MajorityPAC) December 9, 2025

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

The post quickly prompted responses from other users on the platform, many of whom argued that the chart lacked context and did not support the conclusion presented by the group.

Critics said the chart showed long-term trends without isolating specific time periods or policy decisions, and they accused the organization of selectively framing data for political purposes.

Some users pointed out that similar arguments had been made earlier in the year regarding other consumer costs.

According to critics, Democratic operatives had previously blamed President Trump for rising egg prices earlier in the year and for higher power bills in the fall, despite those increases occurring largely over the prior four years.

X user ALX was among those who highlighted what they described as missing context in the Senate Majority PAC’s presentation, arguing that the chart alone did not explain why prices rose or which policies were responsible.

Oh boy, retarded Democrats posted another graph that makes them look bad again. pic.twitter.com/7KumPQoXal

— ALX 🇺🇸 (@alx) December 9, 2025

Another X user, Peter Shrink, also circulated commentary disputing the narrative put forward by the group.

pic.twitter.com/ufEmxQYHLB

— Peter Shrinks (@PShrinks) December 9, 2025

The criticism echoed previous disputes involving the use of economic charts by Democratic groups.

Observers noted that Senate Majority PAC’s post was not the first instance in which Democrats were accused of misreading or misrepresenting pricing data.

In past cases, similar claims about grocery prices have drawn public rebuttals.

Kyle Bass, founder and chief investment officer of Hayman Capital Management, was cited by critics as having recently highlighted what they described as another example of misleading claims by Democrats involving grocery prices.

Bass previously used publicly available data to argue that price trends were being selectively interpreted for political messaging.

Do you understand what you are showing here? It’s identical to grocery prices. 🤦 pic.twitter.com/8PpfJSniUX

— 🇺🇸 Kyle Bass 🇹🇼 (@Jkylebass) November 26, 2025

Critics of the Senate Majority PAC post also said the group failed to mention actions taken by President Trump related to global supply chains and efforts aimed at addressing a cattle shortage.

According to those critics, those actions were intended to stabilize supply and ease pressure on supermarket beef prices.

The organization behind the post also drew attention due to its structure and leadership.

Observers noted that Senate Majority PAC’s organizational ties include figures familiar to Democratic political circles, though no additional details were provided in the exchange on X.

The debate over beef prices unfolded alongside broader arguments about responsibility for inflation and food costs.

Critics of the Democratic messaging argued that the Biden-Harris administration had four years to address rising beef prices but did not resolve the issue.

They contended that during that time, the administration focused on other policy priorities rather than measures aimed at lowering food costs.

While Senate Majority PAC’s post sought to frame beef prices as a partisan issue tied to Republicans, the response on X showed that such claims are often quickly challenged by users who analyze the same data differently.

As the debate continued, users on both sides pointed to the importance of context when presenting economic information.

The dispute also reflected a broader pattern in which social media has become a battleground for competing narratives over inflation, food prices, and accountability for economic conditions affecting American consumers.