<![CDATA[california]]><![CDATA[Firearms]]><![CDATA[Gavin Newsom]]><![CDATA[gun control]]><![CDATA[gun rights]]><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]>Featured

Do You Even 2A, Bro? Ninth Circuit Spanks Gavin Newsom…Again – Twitchy

admin
July 25, 2025
0Points
0
0
Do You Even 2A, Bro? Ninth Circuit Spanks Gavin Newsom...Again – Twitchy

For the second time in as many months, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that a California firearms regulation is unconstitutional.

In its latest ruling on Thursday, the court ruled that a law which requires gun owners to submit to a background check, at the purchaser’s expense, every time they purchase ammunition violates gun owners’ Second Amendment rights.





The ruling comes a month after the court decided that California’s gun rationing law, which limited most gun purchases to one per month, was also unconstitutional.

The latest ruling struck a nerve with California Governor Gavin Newsom, who posted a little tantrum on X.

While it’s true that voters in California approved a 2016 referendum, Governor Hair Gel misses two essential points. First, a state referendum in no way, shape, or form outweighs the Constitution. Second, this law initially went into effect in 2018 and was upheld by the Ninth Circuit, but that was all before Bruen.

Recommended

It was the US Supreme Court decision in the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen that changed everything.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals struck down California’s first-in-the-nation law requiring background checks for ammunition purchases, another blow to the state’s gun control framework that has been pared down, case by case, since the U.S. Supreme Court dramatically expanded gun rights in a monumental 2022 decision. 

The California law that forced ammunition purchasers to pass a background check was passed by voters in 2016. Gov. Gavin Newsom, at the time the state’s lieutenant governor, championed the initiative and was its primary advocate. 

In 2018, before the law went into effect, a group of gun rights advocates and ammunition vendors sued to block the law. 

They were successful – in 2020, a federal district court judge handed down an injunction against the background checks of ammunition purchasers. But at the time, the 9th Circuit paused that order and allowed the law to take effect.

Two years later, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen that a New York concealed-carry law unfairly constrained people’s right to carry a gun, and California’s gun control regime was thrown into chaos. 

The 9th Circuit then sent the case on background checks for ammunition purchases back down to the federal district court. That court again ruled against the background checks. 

Today’s ruling helped clarify what a post-Bruen future could look like.   





A post-Bruen future that forces states to adhere to the constitutional rights of their constituents keeps leftist politicians like Newsom up at night.

Resign? He wants to be the next President and bring his brand of Commiefornia politics to the entire nation. No, the metrosexual champion of gun control loves himself way too much to resign.

Yeah, that pretty much sums up the court’s decision.


Help us continue to report on and expose the Democrats’ gun control policies and schemes. Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership.





Source link

admin

Related Posts

1 of 53
Copyright © 2025 right2024 - .
Copyright © 2025 right2024 - .