I could easily make this a Seven Quick Things. Or a 17 Quick Things.
Itâs been that kind of week.
But Iâll try to focus on the âquick thingsâ part of the 5QT, which, as youâll see below, is not so easy to do, and so hereâs your carefully curated 5QT.
1. Letâs Hope the Chicago Pope Is Better Than the Chicago President Was
Robert Prevost, born in Chicago but having spent most of his adult life in Peru and Italy rather than stateside, is now Pope Leo XIV. The new pontiff, the first American to hold that title, was announced on Thursday.
This fact is, at minimum, ironic given the peculiar little dust-up earlier this week over a funny AI meme circulating on the internet that had President Trump dressed in full papal regalia.
So much so that Trump was interrogated about the meme, shared as a joke by the White House X account, by a member of the legacy propaganda press…
And almost immediately thereafter, an American becomes the pope.
I cannot believe it.
The Trump Pope meme worked. Now we have an American Pope for the first time in history.
The Vatican clearly did not want Tariffs.
Another Trump win. pic.twitter.com/o0mmkNSoyWâ Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) May 8, 2025
But is this a good thing?
There are a lot of items which make the new pope out to be an open-borders globalist, and he seems to be a critic of Vice President JD Vance. So thereâs that.
The fact that he was elevated to the status of cardinal in 2023 by Pope Francis isnât the greatest thing if youâre a conservative Catholic seeking a departure from Francisâs brand of moral chaos in the Churchâs leadership.
But then there is this…
SCOOP: Our Turning Point Action team pulled the voting history for Pope Leo XIV.
He’s a registered Republican who has voted in Republican primaries when not living abroad.
Our data shows he’s a strong Republican, and he’s pro-life. pic.twitter.com/q9q6hiokiH
â Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) May 8, 2025
Simply registering as a Republican isnât a lot to go on when it comes to this popeâs worldview. That said, itâs better than nothing.
We know some things about Pope Leo XIV at this point. We donât know enough. Itâs entirely possible that he could be someone from the Right who recognized the necessity of following the admonition to make the Long March Through The Institutions, and he might have done and said what heâs done and said in order to continue moving up the line. Now that heâs pope and wonât have to play those games, weâll find out who he is.
Which could be a disaster, or it could not.
For now, weâll simply note weâve finally got an American pope, and itâs about time. All we had to do was put out memes of Trump as the pope, and they decided to meet us halfway.
2. Hereâs Hoping Ed Martin Gets to Haunt His Critics
Something not quite so divine as the white smoke at the Vatican also happened Thursday, which was that Trump pulled the nomination of Ed Martin as the U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., the #2 prosecutorial job in America. He didnât want to do it, but he had to because there werenât enough Republican Senators willing to vote for Martin.
Specifically, the awful Thom Tillis of North Carolina.
Trump provides an update on his nominee for U.S. Attorney:
"Heâs [Ed Martin] a terrific person. He wasnât getting the support from the people that I thoughtâŠ.Iâm very disappointed in that…
…We have somebody else that will be good…
….I just want to say it is⊠pic.twitter.com/lLc4UjqdQY
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) May 8, 2025
This came after the RNCâs National Committeewoman from North Carolina demanded Tillis drop his objections to Martin…
RNC National Committeewoman from @NCGOP, Kyshia Brassington,
Calls on @ThomTillis to confirm @EagleEdMartin for US Attorney in DC.
Way to go, Kyshia!
#ncgop #ncpol pic.twitter.com/Hm5V3AmOkb
— Amy Kremer (@AmyKremer) May 7, 2025
Trump indicated that Martin is getting another job in the Justice Department. My suggestion would be to make him Special Counsel Plenipotentiary, and give him free rein to probe corruption everywhere in government.
Including, perhaps, the U.S. Senate.
There was some talk that the replacement for Martin would be Mike Davis, the outspoken, hard-charging Trump attorney and founder of the âright-wingâ Article III Project. That would be absolutely too delicious, and one wonders if Davis wouldnât have an even tougher road to confirmation through the RINO caucus that Tillis is a member of. But either way, it seems clear Trump is going to appoint someone with solid MAGA credentials to that post.
And Martin is going to be enlisted in the fight.
Again, it sure would be enjoyable to see him given a billet that allows him to haunt the corrupt establishment.
3. Look at These Stupid Grifters
As a member of the media (ugh), I get all kinds of things in my e-mail inbox that our readers do not. This isnât a particularly good thing, most of the time, and Thursday was no exception.
Namely, that I was subjected to a press release from some group called Free Speech For People, which read, in part…
Compiled by Free Speech For Peopleâs team of constitutional lawyers, the articles of Impeachment include multiple abuses of power President Trump has already committed, including: Illegal kidnapping, detention, and removal of U.S. residents; illegal and unconstitutional removal of U.S. residents, migrants, and asylum-seekers to foreign prisons; unlawfully attempting to deport immigrants for peacefully protesting; unconstitutionally usurping Congressâs powers; defying court orders and unconstitutionally usurping judicial authority; abusing his power to seek retribution against perceived adversaries; co-opting and dismantling independent government oversight; unlawfully imposing tariffs; receiving foreign and domestic emoluments; unconstitutionally usurping local and state authority; abusing the emergency power; abusing the pardon power; corruptly dismissing criminal charges against Eric Adams; depriving citizens of their birthright; blocking efforts to secure U.S. elections; planning the forced removal of Palestinians from Gaza; engaging in unlawful, corrupt practices during the 2024 presidential campaign.
Sixteen Members of Congress are now on the record in support of impeaching President Trump, including Rep. Shri Thanedar (MI-13), who introduced articles of impeachment on April 28th. Rep. Al Green (TX-09) has announced that he plans to introduce articles of impeachment against the president.
Members of Congress on record in support of impeachment include Representatives Mark DeSaulnier (CA-10), Sam Liccardo (CA-16), Maxine Waters (CA-43), Hank Johnson (GA-04), Delia Ramirez (IL-03), Rashida Tlaib (MI-12), Shri Thanedar (MI-13), Ilhan Omar (MN-05), Suzanne Bonamici (OR-01), Maxine Dexter (OR-03), Dwight Evans (PA-03), Al Green (TX-09), Lloyd Doggett (TX-37), Becca Balint (VT-AL), and Kevin Mullin (CA-15). Senator Jon Ossoff of Georgia has also made a public statement in support of impeachment.
âBacked by hundreds of thousands of Americans demanding impeachment, Congress must fulfill its constitutional duty and impeach and remove Trump for his multiple high crimes,â says Alexandra Flores-Quilty, Free Speech For Peopleâs Campaign Director.
At The Hayride, I had to offer a substantial âPshâ to this…
Fundraising is all the Left is doing now. Itâs the reason why none of their stuff is remotely bipartisan or centrist anymore. Theyâre just a fundraising racket now â fleecing wealthy, miserable people, most of them unmarried women, for $20 here and $50 there.
And they know Trump Derangement Syndrome is the only thing they really have to sell to them. They used to use abortion for that, and it was good for a while, but the problem was that Trump appointed enough Supreme Court justices to dump Roe v. Wade and return that issue to the states, and heâs resisted the calls from the pro-life hardliners to re-federalize the abortion issue and itâs now more or less inert when it comes to federal politics.
And the immigration issue and the race issue are utter disasters for the Left. Nobody wants to hear their message on those topics.
Or on the transgender stuff.
So itâs just âWe Hate Trump And You Should Too.â
When Trump isnât going to run for office ever again. Heâs done after this term. And despite all of the attacks on him it doesnât much look like the facts have followed. The markets have stabilized after his tariff announcements and now the bilateral trade deals are beginning â Trump is signing a trade deal with Great Britain which will be the first of dozens of better deals for American producers that will almost certainly boost economic confidence and performance.
Then later this month weâll get the Big Beautiful Bill which will codify Trump policy on a host of topics and further enervate the Left.
Sure, they hate it, but what can they do about it? Come up with better ideas? Weâve seen their ideas. They arenât sellable. Nor do they have anybody sellable to push them. Look at that list of Democrats signing on to this idiocy of trying to impeach Trump a third time â itâs a pristine collection of unwanted toys whoâve reached the terminal velocity of their political careers.
4. New Yorkâs Chubby-Queen Statue Controversy
Youâve probably seen this new statue that went up in Times Square in New York. Itâs of a nameless black woman of no particular accomplishment, notability, or attractiveness.
BREAKING: The statue of a 12 foot âplus sizeâ African American woman has been erected in the middle of Time Square.
Behold, the symbol of liberal, secular America. Fat and horrible.ïżŒ pic.twitter.com/iAu6cSQD20
â Jake Hilton (@YHVHsword) May 7, 2025
This irked The Federalistâs John Daniel Davidson to no end, mostly because he spotted the ideological psy-op behind it…
The statue, weâre told, âdisrupts preconceived ideas of what defines a triumphant figure and challenges who should be rendered immortal through monumentalization.â
These people do not come to build but to destroy, and what they erect in the place of what they have destroyed isnât just boring and narcissistic, itâs also cultural propaganda that insists on a neo-Marxist paradigm pitting the supposedly marginalized and oppressed against the oppressors. And we all know who the oppressors are.
Recall that in recent years New York City removed a statue of Thomas Jefferson that had stood in city hall for 187 years and took down a statue of Theodore Roosevelt outside the American Museum of Natural History that had been there for nearly a century. The monuments to these great Americans were, in the leftâs telling, nothing more than celebrations of racism and bigotry, and had to be torn down as part of their cultural revolution.
And what do they offer as a replacement for the likes of Jefferson and Roosevelt in the public square? A celebration of both mediocrity and identity. The official description of the ground-level statute states âthe woman ⊠cuts a stark contrast to the pedestaled permanent monuments â both white, both men â which bookend Duffy Square, while embodying a quiet gravity and grandeur.â
Davidson nailed it.
Youâre supposed to be noteworthy, meaning, having noteworthy accomplishments, if somebody is going to take the time to memorialize you with a public artwork. All those statues of old white guys the Leftâs stormtrooper activists insist on pulling down were erected in order to celebrate the achievements of great men. Sure, some of them might not be in the best odor currently, just like most of the people â and particularly the political luminaries the bowdlerizers like to vote for â wonât stand the test of time a century from now.
I would imagine that when technology does for abortion what it did for slavery, namely, making it obsolete, every pro-abortion politician in America is going to begin stinking like last weekâs fish.
Which is why presentism is such a fallacious and irritating intellectual pursuit.
Anyway, weâre now going to replace celebrations of great and consequential deeds, not to mention celebrations of the ideal male or female form as understood by the artist, with celebrations of what? Walmartians?
One wonders if the Chubby Queen in Times Square is wearing those flesh-colored leggings, which leave too little to the imagination that a certain segment of the population mistakenly believes are attractive.
Yes, itâs awful. At RVIVR, though, Andy Hogue notes that your outrage should be on a timer, because so is the Chubby Queen…
Yet itâs not a monument at all. Itâs a temporary art piece with a permit for one month, where many such proactive pieces have been on display. And get ready: the art group has a contract to take over Times Squareâs billboards at midnight and display images of other âmarginalized bodies.â All, of course, not designed to inspire or comment, but âdisrupt.â
â[The sculpture] disrupts traditional ideas around what defines a triumphant figure and challenges who should be rendered immortal through monumentalization,â the press release stated (emphasis ours on the brand-new word).
Disrupting what remains the question. On the northern triangle of Times Square is an area known as Duffy Square. The square has two statues, which are referenced by the art group in the press release. One is a bronze statue of Chaplain Francis P. Duffy of New Yorkâs âFighting 69thâ Army Infantry Regiment who served in Western France during World War I, for whom the square is named, sculpted by Charles Keck.
The other statue depicts composer, playwright, producer and actor George M. Cohan â the man who basically gave us Broadway â by sculptor Georg J. Lober.
âIn other words, the wokes decided it was time for the Times Square white men to give up some of their turf to a big black woman who wants to speak to a manager NOW,â a commentary on Outkick opined. (We also used their photo, by the way.)
Weâll stop there before we get in trouble â which may also be the goal of the temporary installation, come to think of it.
Iâll take Andyâs advice and leave it at that. But I would suggest to the Chubby Queen, in case sheâs listening, that keto absolutely works and that she needs to get with the program.
5. Trumpâs Foreign-Movie Tariff and Paul Kengorâs Poor Review Of It
I was going to do an entire column on this yesterday, and then it was superseded by those three idiot House Republicans telling House Speaker Mike Johnson they wouldnât vote to defund Planned Parenthood â and I had to weigh in on that.
You ask why Johnson keeps giving the House days off? Crap like that is why. He keeps running into rogue RINOs in his caucus who refuse to get with the program on very basic things, and what his chosen solution has become is to send everybody home and let the voters back home burn up their phone lines to get them straight on the task at hand.
Which, hopefully, is whatâs happening to Mike Lawler, Brian Fitzpatrick, and Jen Kiggens, who apparently arenât smart enough to know that white-knighting for Planned Parenthood is not what you do as a Republican. (RELATED: These Are Morons If This Story Is True)
Anyway, American Spectator editor Paul Kengor is no fan of Trumpâs proposed 100 percent tariff on foreign-made films, which is intended to incentivize film production back home in the USA…
Why in the world does Donald Trump want to protect Hollywood? Does he not realize what kind of bilge Hollywoke has been producing and, hence, why it has been failing? What the left-wingers who have hijacked Hollywood need is more, rather than less, foreign competition. The last thing they deserve is to be bailed out as they continue to generate garbage. Modern Hollywoodâs values are antithetical to what has made America great. Its values certainly run contrary to those of Trump supporters.
The reality is that because of the leftist takeover of Tinseltown, conservative filmmakers have been forced to go abroad to make movies independently, having been blacklisted by the Hollywood Left. And hereâs something that President Trump particularly needs to know: Another major reason for American filmmakers bolting Hollywood for greener pastures is that the taxes in California are so outrageous that the environment for making films there is cost-prohibitive.
Kengor notes that under a Breitbart story about the proposal, the commenters engaged in a collective raspberry for the ages. There is no sympathy at all for Hollywood among Trump supporters, and rightly so.
I agree with everything Paul said. But Iâm going to treat Trump a little more generously, because I think I see what heâs going for. Two thoughts here.
First, there are a number of countries, particulary in Eastern Europe currently (but also in Ireland and Italy, among others), where very generous incentives have been laid down to incentivize film production. If your aim is to revitalize filmmaking in America given those circumstances, youâve got two general methods available to do that.
The first way is to try to match those incentives, which involves a whole lot of moving parts. The second way is simply to tariff those made-abroad films and therefore wipe out the advantages filmmakers might get from filming in Romania.
Iâm not saying that this is what Iâd do. Iâm just noting that if youâre really serious about resuscitating domestic filmmaking so that spaghetti Westerns and goulash crime dramas arenât our future, those are the two levers available to you in public policy, and the tariff one is probably easier to pull.
The second thing Iâll say is that while Iâm absolutely on board with Paulâs point about Hollywoodâs vast deficiencies and I call it social justice if the entire industry collapses as currently constituted, if you see film production as a cultural manifestation of manufacturing, you might also see movies and TV as something akin to the car industry when American manufacturers went into a big slump in the 1970s and 1980s. What happened then was that foreign carmakers came in and lapped up big chunks of the global and domestic market share, and our Big Three have never really remedied that.
Film, as a manifestation of culture, might be every bit as important as carmaking. And America has to dominate global cultural output â because if we donât, then the alternatives are not good. Especially if instead of us, itâs China. Weâve already seen the deleterious effect that Chinese money and the Chinese movie market have had on American film production.
This isnât an argument for protecting Hollywood, you understand, but who says Hollywood has to be the American film industry? Most American-made movies are filmed elsewhere in the States because of Californiaâs stupid tax and regulatory policies; rather than allow foreigners to eat away at our cultural content production, the solution might be to promote competing domestic film producers in ways our dumb public policy wouldnât allow when the Big Three carmakers were faltering in the latter part of the last industry.
If weâd had a host of startup carmakers in the 1980s making interesting new car models, Volkswagen, Toyota, and the rest might never have penetrated this market as they did. Maybe if we try to promote startup film production companies reflecting the values of real Americans rather than whatever it is that Hollywood is trying to push on us, we can avoid a similar fate in showbiz.
Anyway, I tried to make this a quick things post, and Iâve horribly failed again. For that, I say please accept an apology and have yourself a happy weekend!
READ MORE from Scott McKay:
These Are Morons If This Story Is True
Carbon Capture: The Scam Agreed Upon
Five Quick Things: The Utter, Complete, and Glorious Evisceration of the Legacy Propaganda Press
The post Five Quick Things: Habemas Trumpam? appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.