Instagram’s New Map Feature Wants to Be Your — And Your Friends’ — Big Brother | The American Spectator

Instagram’s recently launched Map feature, which rolled out Wednesday, purports to help friends stay “up-to-date” by allowing you to share your “last active location” in real time. Meta insists that this feature is off by default, requires you to opt in, and is limited to mutual followers or a custom list of users. But the uproar from users — especially those concerned about women, minors, and survivors of abuse — reveals the real issue: it’s another stride toward the normalization of social media as surveillance, not as a tool for human connection.

Despite Meta’s assurances, plenty of users claimed the feature was enabled automatically or linked to location data through tagged posts — even when their phone settings were set to “Never.” This gap between corporate messaging and user experience breeds distrust: how safe can a privacy promise be when it could flicker on without your say-so? (RELATED: Digital Peeping Toms: The Perverts Building Your Dating Apps)

This isn’t just about friends knowing where you are; it’s about giving Meta access to your every move. When you reveal your location to your friends, you are also giving it to Instagram. After all, location data is gold for advertising algorithms and behavioral profiling. Meta’s privacy track record — from data breaches to mishandling user information — has already eroded faith in its “opt-in” infrastructure. (RELATED: Is This the Stupidest Sentence of 2025?)

Some proponents of this feature argue that it is helpful. They believe it functions as a digital equivalent of parents checking in on kids. But if this feature is meant to be used as a safety mechanism, especially one for children under age 18, why make Instagram the house of this cautionary tool? Just months ago, Instagram was touting the idea of getting underage users off the platform altogether or segregating them to “Teen Accounts.” This PR move was contradicted by Instagram’s newfangled attempt to compete with Snapchat’s user location-farming.

3. Share locations with friends and see what’s happening around you on the Instagram map 🗺️💞

And if you’re a parent with supervision set up for your teen, you have control over whether they can share their location, and who they’re sharing with.

(Available in some countries) pic.twitter.com/cMPpl9j20t

— Instagram (@instagram) August 6, 2025

In past generations, parents tracked school attendance or curfews — if even. These boundaries were physical, relational, and arguably more respectful of privacy. They were addressed person-to-person, not finger-to-screen. Today, that dynamic has shifted dramatically. The digital age has turned location into an everyday data point, privacy into a negotiable feature, and connection into constant monitoring.

Instagram Map, if used intentionally, will be available to view on profiles as a status alert, updated the same way users post a moody song to their Instagram Stories. But others, less aware of this new feature, or those looking to use it for safety purposes, may be out of luck. It’s one thing to check in with a text or a call; it’s another to be perpetually visible to a corporation whose interests rarely align perfectly with your own well-being. (RELATED: Self-Reliance: The Lost Trail of Silicon Valley)

What this new Instagram feature exposes is a deep tension between convenience and control. In our desire to feel connected and safe, we may willingly surrender the very privacy that sustains individual autonomy. This trade-off is rarely transparent, giving symbiotic interaction between geolocating friends when, in reality, Big Tech companies are making out like bandits from this illusion. This normalization of surveillance through social media sets a precedent: that privacy is an outdated luxury and that being “seen” takes precedent over being secure.

This normalization is not incidental; it’s deliberate. Tech companies like Meta monetize attention and behavior patterns, and location data offers unparalleled insights into users’ daily rhythms. In a world where every movement can be tracked, mapped, and sold, the concept of privacy becomes fragmented, fractured into permissions hidden deep in settings menus few understand or care to read. Give them an inch? Well, they’ll take a mile — don’t forget the tyranny of Big Tech’s COVID and 2020 election censorship under the guise of “harmful misinformation.” (RELATED: The Global Censorship Cancer)

Constant surveillance rewires our expectations of relationships. Friendship and family become layers of data points rather than human exchanges. Trust morphs from mutual respect and honesty to the assurance that one’s location will be known and accounted for. And when privacy violations inevitably happen, as they almost always do, victims are left doubly harmed — first by the breach itself, and second by the erosion of faith in digital platforms meant to connect them.

To reclaim control, society must reckon with what it means to be connected in the digital age. It means asking hard questions: Who benefits from this “always on” connectivity? What are the true costs of sharing our whereabouts? How do we protect the vulnerable without branding technology that leaves them vulnerable as “fun” or a “safety tool”? And most importantly, how do we rebuild digital spaces that honor privacy as a fundamental right, not as a negotiable feature buried beneath layers of corporate interest?

Instagram’s Map feature may be the latest iteration of a familiar trend, but it’s also a wake-up call. It challenges us, once again, to reconsider the price of convenience, the meaning of safety, and the value of privacy. Seeing our friends’ location on Instagram may be a cool piece of information to know — but we must ask how Meta benefits from this new feature. As users, we must demand transparency, control, and respect — not just empty promises of “opt-in” safeguards. The free market operates on the notion of supply and demand, so we must not become complacent in the corrosion of natural boundaries of human bonds to benefit Big Tech’s bottom line.

Because if Instagram becomes the friend who watches you more than listens to you, then privacy isn’t just lost — it’s handed over, willingly, to an unblinking Big Brother that profits from our most intimate movements.

READ MORE from Julianna Frieman:

No, Epstein Was Not Melania Trump’s Matchmaker

Gen Z Isn’t Just Online — They’re Living in Parallel Realities

Gavin Newsom Wants To Be Donald Trump So Badly

Julianna Frieman is a writer based in North Carolina. She received her bachelor’s degree in political science from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. She is pursuing her master’s degree in Communications (Digital Strategy) at the University of Florida. Her work has been published by the Daily Caller, The American Spectator, and The Federalist. Follow her on X at @juliannafrieman.