Is Adam Sandler America’s Finest Actor? – The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator

It sounds like a ridiculous question to ask.

After all, this is the guy from Billy Madison and Big Daddy. A class clown in oversized shorts, an overgrown child who made yelling and crude humor into a multi-decade empire. In just a few months, he’ll be back in Happy Gilmore 2, likely screaming at a golf ball and lobbing clubs into the crowd.

But there is another side to Sandler. Sometimes, he’s brilliant. Not just better than expected. Not just “good for a comedian.” Brilliant. Disturbingly so. What if the finest actor in America is the guy we all assumed was a joke?

Because right now, as Oscar buzz builds around his lead role in Noah Baumbach’s Jay Kelly, Sandler isn’t just surprising people; he’s forcing them to rethink everything they thought they knew about him. Industry talk says it’s the most honest and powerful role he’s ever done. And for those who’ve been watching, this isn’t out of nowhere.  Sandler has always lived a double life. To many, he’s a glorified jester, an SNL veteran, and the uncrowned king of lowbrow laughs. But buried within that filmography lies a shadow resume.

In 2002’s Punch-Drunk Love, Sandler delivered a performance so emotionally volatile and controlled that it stunned critics into silence. Paul Thomas Anderson didn’t just “use” Sandler well; he trusted him to carry the entire film. The result was a tender, weird, and unforgettable portrait of loneliness and rage that revealed depths few knew he had.

In 2009’s criminally underrated Funny People, Sandler played a dying comedian carrying the weight of his fame, fortune, and regrets. It was raw and unsettling — less a performance, more a glimpse into something real. The silence between the lines said more than any punchline ever could. It was eerie. Meta. A performance as much about Sandler himself as his character.

And in Uncut Gems, the New Yorker delivered a masterclass in controlled chaos. As Howard Ratner, he was magnetic, manic, infuriating, and completely believable. It was a tour de force. A performance so singular and exhausting that it left viewers shaken, myself included. Even in Hustle, a considerably less chaotic film about basketball scouting, Sandler brought gravity and grace to the screen. No theatrics. Just patience. Stillness. A man trying to claw his way back to relevance, and doing it with dignity.

All these roles prove one thing: when Sandler wants to, he can level the playing field. Just as easily as he can coast through something like Murder Mystery, he can deliver a performance that leaves critics stunned.  That’s what unsettles the old guard; he doesn’t play by their rules. He can live in both worlds. And win in both. When you think about it, isn’t that the dream? Isn’t that what Hollywood always pretends it rewards — versatility, longevity, artistic bravery?

In reality, the industry often punishes the actors who refuse to fit in. Bill Murray never got his Oscar. Neither did Jim Carrey, who should’ve been nominated for The Truman Show, Man on the Moon, and Eternal Sunshine all in a row. These men made their names in comedy. And for some reason, that’s still considered a disqualifier in elite circles. Drama gets awards. Comedy gets condescension. (RELATED: The Politics of Comedy)

For better or worse, Sandler never seemed to care. He stayed in his lane when it suited him, then crossed over (without signaling, of course) when he felt compelled. He made garbage. He made art. He made money. And maybe that’s what truly bothers the snobs: not that Sandler can act, but that he never begged for their approval.

He built Happy Madison Productions. He cast his friends. He made whatever movies he wanted, no matter how dumb. And then, once every five years, he’d remind you he’s got one of the strangest and most effective dramatic toolkits in American film.

And now, with Jay Kelly, the joke might finally be over. The film pairs him with George Clooney, sets him loose in a script about aging, regret, and late-life reinvention.

The question is no longer whether Sandler is capable. It’s whether voters will finally take him seriously. Whether Hollywood, for once, can see past the comic and see the craftsman. If he wins an Oscar, it might restore some faith in an industry that often idolizes the dull and ignores the daring. Because what Sandler offers is unpredictability and tension, that electric feeling you get when someone surprises you in plain sight. You know he can be silly. You know he can be loud. What you don’t know is what he’ll do next. And in a town full of templates and tired formulas, that makes him utterly unique.

READ MORE from John Mac Ghlionn:

Warfare: A Uniquely Devastating War Film

Conor McGregor and Tucker Carlson Walk Into a Bar

The Fall of Harvard: How America’s Oldest University Became Its Most Expensive Liability