Kids shouldn’t be forced to read LGBTQ storybooks, Supreme Court rules

The Supreme Court sided Friday with parents seeking to opt their children out of required LGBTQ storybook lessons.

In an 6-3 ruling, the majority held that parents are likely to succeed in their claim that the school board’s decision violates their First Amendment rights.

“The Board’s introduction of the ‘LGBTQ+-inclusive’ storybooks, along with its decision to withhold opt outs, places an unconstitutional burden on the parents’ rights to the free exercise of their religion,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the majority opinion. “The parents have therefore shown that they are likely to succeed in their free exercise claims. They have likewise shown entitlement to a preliminary injunction pending the completion of this lawsuit.”

The Montgomery County Board of Education refused in March 2023 to allow parents to opt out of mandatory storybook readings involving pronouns, transgender children and pride parades, despite initially promising they would be allowed to do so. Parents sued the district in May 2023.

Mahmoud v. Taylor is one of several religious liberty cases the justices considered this term.

The Supreme Court unanimously held that Wisconsin’s denial of a religious tax exemption to Catholic Charities violates the First Amendment. In a 4-4 May decision, the justices left in place a ruling that prevented establishing the nation’s first religious public charter school.

This is a breaking news story and will be updated.

 All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

Latest posts by Katelynn Richardson (see all)

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.