Featured

Minneapolis Police Chief Threatens to Fire Officers Who Don’t Confront ICE During Arrests [WATCH]

Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara said this week that city officers could be terminated if they fail to act when witnessing what he described as “unlawful” or “excessive” force by federal immigration agents.

O’Hara made the remarks during a press conference amid increased Immigration and Customs Enforcement activity in Minneapolis.

“If unlawful force is being used by any law enforcement officer against any person in this city and one of our officers is there, absolutely, I expect them to intervene, or they’ll be fired,” O’Hara said.

He referenced the aftermath of George Floyd’s death in 2020, adding, “We’re not going to repeat that mistake with any agency federal or otherwise.”

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

The directive surfaced as ICE has increased operations near Karmel Mall, a major hub for Minneapolis’ Somali community.

Witnesses have reported federal agents conducting surveillance and detaining individuals in the area.

Videos circulated online have drawn additional attention from community groups and activists.

O’Hara’s position has drawn criticism from those who argue the policy could interfere with federal authority.

A social media post reacting to the announcement questioned the framing of the directive and referenced ongoing online debate about immigration enforcement.

The Department of Homeland Security responded to O’Hara’s comments.

Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said, “Does Chief O’Hara want his officers to intervene as our law enforcement arrests the convicted murderers, rapists, and gang members responsible for violence in American communities?”

The exchange highlighted emerging tensions between local leadership and federal immigration enforcement agencies.

Minneapolis, as a sanctuary city, already limits cooperation with ICE, but the new directive raises questions about the extent to which local officers may be required to act in situations involving federal personnel.

Federal law restricts interference with ICE operations, and Minneapolis Police Department policy instructs officers not to obstruct federal activity.

O’Hara’s directive raises the possibility that officers could face conflicting obligations between city policy and federal statutes, potentially exposing them to legal consequences.

O’Hara reaffirmed his position, stating, “Our officers here have a duty to intervene… not just from law enforcement, from our own agency.”

He described the policy as part of broader police accountability measures.

Some local activists questioned whether the directive would result in concrete action. “I’ll believe it when I see it,” said Miri Villerius.

Community groups have reported concerns tied to recent nighttime enforcement operations, including accounts of masked agents and rapidly executed detentions.

O’Hara has encouraged residents to call 911 if they suspect an individual posing as a federal agent.

The guidance has added to concerns about distinguishing between local and federal authority, particularly because ICE frequently uses administrative warrants rather than judicial ones.

This has contributed to questions about the extent of city officers’ involvement during federal enforcement actions.

While no Minneapolis officers have faced discipline under the directive, legal analysts have noted that any physical interference with ICE agents could prompt immediate legal review.

The situation places Minneapolis at the center of an ongoing national discussion regarding sanctuary policies, local policing authority, and interactions between municipal governments and federal agencies.

How the directive is applied, and whether it withstands legal scrutiny, may help shape future approaches to local-federal coordination in cities with sanctuary policies.



Source link

Related Posts

1 of 942