Mother of all threads shows George Soros is behind today’s systems of NGO

An online data analyst has laid out how leftist billionaire George Soros has been using non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to force his Marxist vision upon society both here and abroad.

According to analyst Jennica Pounds, who goes by DataRepublican on X, the beginning of Soros’ evil empire starts with an 1993 essay he wrote entitled, “Toward a New World Order: The Future of NATO.”

THREAD: GEORGE SOROS, THE MASTERMIND

Today’s systems of NGOs isn’t accidental – it was laid out in a vision 30 years ago by none other than George Soros.

I joined @MikeBenzCyber on a livestream last night, where he was kind enough to walk us through the basics.

As my bio… pic.twitter.com/qOHKiDHTjI

— DataRepublican (small r) (@DataRepublican) May 2, 2025

“The essay lays out a new mission for NATO after the cold war,” Pounds explained in an X thread published Friday. “NATO would no longer be a defensive alliance against Russia – that is obsolete. Instead, it would proactively go out and shape other countries into ‘open societies.’”

“In other words, NATO’s new mission: if a country doesn’t adopt Western-style capitalism and liberalism, NATO should step in… politically, economically, and eventually, militarily,” she added.

Sound familiar? It should if you’ve heard of Soros’ Open Society Foundations, which uses it power and wealth to interfere in the politics of not only America but other nations as well.

Pounds continued her thread by noting that an “open society” in theory means democracy, free markets, civil rights, minority protections, transparency, and a “global” rules-based order — but in practice means something entirely different.

“You’re an open society if you accept our interpretation of pluralism and Western values,” she wrote, channeling Soros’ mindset. “Otherwise, we’ll label you ‘closed,’ even if your people elect their leaders or protect cultural traditions. And this gives us pretext to justify military actions on you.”

“We pour aid into countries that remake themselves in Soros’ image. And no amount of money is too much to accomplish that because, again, we have redefined ‘peace’ to mean ‘as many countries follow the Open Society model as possible.’ And if aid fails, then military intervention is next,” she added.

: , .

Soros Quote:
” … … pic.twitter.com/bhosxCdd1H

— DataRepublican (small r) (@DataRepublican) May 2, 2025

The point is that, according to Soros’ thinking, democracy isn’t decided by its constituents but rather on whether a country’s ideology and vision for the future aligns with what Soros wants.

The key, Pounds explained, lies in using endless foreign aid to force countries into compliance. What about those countries that don’t comply? They get decimated like Bosnia did in 1994.

“NATO’s new job is not to defend member states, but to expand its presence eastward and actively shape the internal politics of neighboring states, especially the post-Soviet bloc,” she continued, further channeling Soros’ mindset.

But none of this is theoretical, she stressed. The proof lies in the current reality seen across the world, i.e., the IMF and World Bank’s suspicious loans that always come with political demands, the promotion of corrupt politicians (think Ukraine), and the abundance of well-paid, left-wing bureaucrats, NGOs, journalists, and professors.

“And if you dare to cut off that money spigot… in other words, if you practice any kind of populist principles or try and assert agency for your own nation: You are an enemy of democracy,” Pounds wrote. “Because George Soros said so.”

Why did everyone go along with this model? Simple. Enormous amounts of money was involved. Here’s a list who benefited:

‍ NGO Networks (Open Society Foundations, USAID, NED)
→ More influence, more contracts, more justification for expansion

️ Bureaucrats & Diplomats
→…

— DataRepublican (small r) (@DataRepublican) May 2, 2025

Pounds concluded her stunning thread by imploring folks to not conflate Soros’ ostensible pro-“democracy” politics with anti-communism.

“Don’t confuse George Soros’s model of NATO promoting ‘open societies’ with being anti-communist,” she wrote. “Soros didn’t oppose the Soviet Union because it was communist. He opposed it because it was nationalist. It resisted foreign influence and maintained centralized control over its own ideology and borders.”

“His vision of an ‘open society’ blends left-wing radicalism (identity politics, anti-tradition, anti-sovereignty) with globalist structures (NGOs, Western institutions, and transnational finance). The more you read his writings, the clearer it becomes that ‘Open Society’ is a circular label for regimes that accept Soros-style politics. Anyone who resists this framework is cast as an enemy of ‘democracy.’ And if you’re MAGA, that means you,” she added.

View the whole thread for yourself here.

Senior Staff Writer
[email protected]

V. Saxena is a staff writer for BizPac Review with a decade of experience as a professional writer, and a lifetime of experience as an avid news junkie. He holds a degree in computer technology from Purdue University.

Latest posts by Vivek Saxena (see all)

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.