Latest    News/Commentary  PoliticsFeatured

Tulsi Gabbard releases damning reports with new evidence against Obama as promised

admin
July 23, 2025
0Points
0
0
Tulsi Gabbard releases damning reports with new evidence against Obama as promised

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is spilling all the secrets and things are not looking good for former President Barack Obama.

The House Intelligence Committee found that the intel community knew that there was no direct information indicating Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted then-presidential candidate Donald Trump to win the 2016 election. However, at the “unusual” direction of Obama, went on to publish “potentially biased” or “implausible” intel that suggested otherwise.

Gabbard declassified a House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence report from back in 2020, posting the facts on her official X account for all to see.

“New evidence has emerged of the most egregious weaponization and politicization of intelligence in American history. Per President [Trump]‘s directive, I have declassified a [House Intelligence] oversight majority staff report that exposes how the Obama Administration manufactured the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment that they knew was false, promoting the LIE that Vladimir Putin and the Russian government helped President Trump win the 2016 election. In doing so, they conspired to subvert the will of the American people, working with their partners in the media to promote the lie, in order to undermine the legitimacy of President Trump, essentially enacting a years-long coup against him. Here are the top Obama Russia Hoax lies debunked by today’s release,” she wrote, adding a link to the files.

“LIE: Putin and the Russian Government helped Trump win the 2016 election,” she continued in the thread. “TRUTH: President Obama, former Director of the CIA John Brennan, and others fabricated the Russia Hoax, suppressed intelligence showing Putin was preparing for a Clinton victory, manufactured findings from shoddy sources, disobeyed IC standards, and knowingly lied to the American people.”

“LIE: The fabricated Steele Dossier was not used as a source in the Obama Administration’s January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment of the November 2016 election,” Gabbard added. “TRUTH: Not only did CIA Director Brennan, FBI Director Comey, DNI Clapper and others include the Steele Dossier in the 2017 ICA, they overruled senior Intel officials who warned them it was fabricated and should not be used.”

“LIE: The Obama Administration’s January ICA was an independent Intelligence Community product, produced with apolitical analysis. TRUTH: Obama ordered the Intelligence Community to create an Intelligence Community Assessment they knew was false, promoting a contrived narrative, with the intent of undermining the legitimacy and power of a duly elected President of the United States, Donald Trump.”

Summing up the thread, Gabbard accused the Obama administration of “knowingly” crafting the Russiagate hoax that plagued Trump’s first term in an attempt to “undermine the legitimacy and power of the duly elected President of the United States, Donald Trump.”

Fox News Digital was able to obtain the “fully-sourced limited-access investigation report that was drafted and stored in a limited-access vault at CIA Headquarters,” which they claim includes “some redactions.

“The committee focused on the creation of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) of 2017, in which then-CIA Director John Brennan pushed for the inclusion of the now-discredited anti-Trump dossier, despite knowing it was based largely on ‘internet rumor,’ as Fox News Digital previously reported,” the article explains.

The ICA, according to the report, was a “high-profile product ordered by the President, directed by senior IC agency heads, and created by just five CIA analysts, using one principal drafter.”

“Production of the ICA was subject to unusual directives from the President and senior political appointees, and particularly DCIA,” it continues, according to Fox’s report. “The draft was not properly coordinated within CIA or the IC, ensuring it would be published without significant challenges to its conclusions.”

“The committee found that the five CIA analysts and drafters ‘rushed’ the ICA’s production ‘in order to publish two weeks before President-elect Trump was sworn-in,’” the outlet states.

“Hurried coordination and limited access to the draft reduced opportunities for the IC to discover misquoting of sources and other tradecraft concerns,” the report reads.

“The report states that Brennan ‘ordered the post-election publication of 15 reports containing previously collected but unpublished intelligence, three of which were substandard—containing information that was unclear, of uncertain origin, potentially biased, or implausible—and those became foundational sources for the ICA judgements that Putin preferred Trump over Clinton,’” Fox claims.

“The ICA misrepresented these reports as reliable, without mentioning their significant underlying flaws. One scant, unclear, and unverifiable fragment of a sentence from one of the substandard reports constitutes the only classified information cited to suggest Putin ‘aspired’ to help Trump win,” the report continues, going on to claim that the ICA “ignored or selectively quoted reliable intelligence reports that challenged-and in some cases undermined—judgments that Putin sought to elect Trump.”

It went on to allege that the ICA “failed to consider plausible alternative explanations of Putin’s intentions indicated by reliable intelligence and observed Russian actions.”

In fact, two CIA officers even went so far as to advise Brennan that “we don’t have direct information that Putin wanted to get Trump elected.”

Obama ordered the information to be published despite the fact that the ICA “did not cite any report where Putin directly indicated helping Trump win was the objective.”

“The ICA, according to the report, excluded ‘significant intelligence’ and ‘ignored or selectively quoted’ reliable intelligence in an effort to push the Russia narrative,” Fox reports. “The report also includes intelligence from a longtime Putin confidant who explained to investigators that ‘Putin told him he did not care who won the election,’ and that Putin ‘had often outlined the weaknesses of both major candidates.’”

The ICA also reportedly included context indicating the claim that Putin wanted Trump to win was entirely “implausible—if not ridiculous.” They also “suppressed intelligence that showed that Russia was actually planning for a Hillary Clinton victory because ‘they knew where (she) stood’ and believed ‘Russia could work with her,’” according to Fox.

Additionally, the committee pointed out that the ICA also failed to “address why Putin chose not to leak more discrediting material on Clinton” as the 2016 election came to a close.

“The committee also found that the ICA suppressed intelligence showing that Putin was ‘not only demonstrating a clear lack of concern for Trump’s election fate,’ but also indicated ‘that he preferred to see Secretary Clinton elected, knowing she would be a more vulnerable President,’” Fox wrote.

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.

Sierra Marlee
Latest posts by Sierra Marlee (see all)

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.



Source link

admin

Related Posts

1 of 53
Copyright © 2025 right2024 - .
Copyright © 2025 right2024 - .