Why Democrats Can’t — and Won’t — Replicate MAGA | The American Spectator

Democrats are in dire straits, uncertain of what they believe, unsure of where to turn. Behind closed doors, some whisper about reinvention. The chatter points in one direction: their own version of a populist, anti-establishment, MAGA-like makeover. A Democratic brand of ‘people power’ to counter Trump’s movement. A rebellion in blue, packaged as the ticket back to the White House in 2028.

The fantasy is seductive. After all, MAGA reshaped the Republican Party almost overnight. Trump dismantled its stale orthodoxies — globalism, Bush-era wars, free-trade dogma — and replaced them with raw populism. He gave disillusioned voters not just rhetoric, but a cause, a movement to rally behind. Republicans who once sneered at protectionism, tariffs, and anti-interventionism now parrot Trump’s lines. Why wouldn’t Democrats try the same? (RELATED: MAGA and the Citizen Against Globalism)

The answer is simple: they can’t. MAGA worked because it was real. Democrats can only mimic, and mimicry is death in politics.

Start with the obvious. Democrats have no Trump. They have no figure capable of summoning the rage, loyalty, and electricity he does. The names floated — Gavin Newsom, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, J.B. Pritzker, Pete Buttigieg — read like a roll call of technocrats auditioning for the role of “populist” in a play no one believes.

Newsom in particular embodies the problem. He markets himself as a fighter against Republican authoritarianism, a slick-haired slayer of “MAGA extremism.” But his rebellion is cosmetic. The suit is tailored. The smile is rehearsed. He is California’s elite distilled into a single man, complete with a Napa vineyard and Hollywood donors. To pretend this is “anti-establishment” is laughable. (RELATED: Gavin Newsom’s California Is a Crashing Caliphate of Chaos)

The Democratic Party is structurally incapable of producing a populist revolt. Why? Because populism requires turning on your own. Trump didn’t just run against Democrats; he ran against Republicans — against the Bushes, McCains, and Romneys who embodied the GOP establishment. MAGA drew its strength from burning bridges. Democrats, by contrast, are institutionally wedded to their elite class. Wall Street, Silicon Valley, Hollywood, the universities, the media — all are not just allies but patrons. To truly mimic MAGA, a Democratic candidate would have to turn on those very forces. That will never happen.

Even their rhetoric betrays the bind. Trump could call the Iraq War a disaster, rail against NAFTA, trash Paul Ryan’s austerity. Democrats cannot denounce woke ideology, green-energy dogmatism, or immigration excess without detonating their coalition. A party that relies on university activists, climate lobbies, and progressive nonprofits cannot run an “anti-establishment” crusade without gutting itself. They are locked into their own orthodoxy.

There is also the problem of authenticity. MAGA was messy, unvarnished, visceral. Democrats prize management, messaging, “narrative discipline.” They prefer candidates who sound like press releases. The more they try to cosplay as populists, the more transparent the act becomes. Joe Biden, once pitched as Scranton Joe, governed as K Street Joe. Hillary Clinton tried “I’m just like you” photo ops, complete with subway rides and awkward Southern accents. Voters saw through it. When Democrats try to connect with everyday Americans, it inevitably slips into parody.

This is why Gavin Newsom matters as a symbol. He is the logical endpoint of Democratic mimicry: a politician who wants to wear the populist mantle without touching the dirt. He growls in debates, rolls up his sleeves, and sprinkles in talk of ‘working people,’ but it’s pure theater. Behind the performance is a man who has never known hardship, never built anything outside politics, never stood where ordinary voters stand. And that’s why the contrast with MAGA is so stark. (RELATED: Gavin Newsom Wants To Be Donald Trump So Badly)

MAGA keeps winning precisely because it isn’t branding; it’s belief. Its voters may not agree on everything, but they know what they despise: open borders, endless wars, cultural decay, rigged trade deals, a ruling class that sneers at them. Democrats cannot replicate this because their base is the ruling class. Their donors, activists, and cultural allies are the very forces Middle America feels trampled by. The party cannot simultaneously defend universities, tech monopolies, and DEI bureaucracies while pretending to be anti-establishment. (RELATED: Democrats’ Real Problem with Populism)

The implications for 2028 are clear. Democrats may attempt a “MAGA of the Left” makeover, complete with new slogans and a candidate who talks tougher than usual. But it will ring hollow. Their coalition cannot tolerate the betrayal necessary to make it real. They are prisoners of their own orthodoxy, trapped between progressive activists demanding purity and elites demanding protection. The result will be more plastic populism — sanctimonious speeches, slick ads, choreographed outrage — that convinces no one outside their base.

MAGA’s endurance proves something deeper: populism isn’t manufactured. It erupts. It grows from genuine betrayal and authentic defiance. It requires risk. Democrats will never risk turning on their true masters. They cannot torch the universities, the tech giants, the donor networks that sustain them. And without that, there’s no rebellion, only political pantomime. MAGA was real. Whatever the Democrats try to sell next, it won’t be.

READ MORE from John Mac Ghlionn:

The Rotten Truth About the Egg Cartel

Bill Maher Wants You to Suffer

Academia’s Most Lucrative Con